Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third-party services that appear on our pages.
For more information on how Google's third party cookies operate and handle your data, see:
Google's Privacy Policy
-
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
-
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name
__Secure-ROLLOUT_TOKEN
Name
VISITOR_PRIVACY_METADATA
-
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Domain
thecliffordmethod.blogspot.com
Domain
thecliffordmethod.blogspot.com
Domain
thecliffordmethod.blogspot.com
Domain
thecliffordmethod.blogspot.com
-
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
-
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Domain
public-api.wordpress.com
Domain
public-api.wordpress.com
Name
wpEmojiSettingsSupports
Name
woosw_data_undefined
As good as the art is (and I stand by my statement that this is a Masterwork), in this issue the writing (and editing) is equally bad. What happened to dialog and story? We have an unknown and unnamed character give an uninterrupted rant for three pages. His sermon/diatribe/lecture drones on and on and on. Like this! 😉 The language doesn't sound like it's coming from the mouth of a guy, riding the rails a hundred years ago. This sounds like a high school term paper, written at three in the morning, the night before it's due. This rambles and uses big words, but it misses the point. This is all about preachy rhetoric and very little about advancing the story. Who is this guy? This Super-Hobo? What makes him say stuff like, "A eunuch designated to represent the manhood of a people," to a young kid and think he's actually communicating ideas? Nobody talks like this! Nobody. Not even me.Super-hobo saves young children from crazed Ukrainian pedophiles. And he carries around a picture of his tortured grandfather's scarred back. How does a picture like that get in the hands of a slave's grandson? Does the grandson just carry around the picture as a visual aid for the hobo lecture circuit?Look. The message is important. The injustice, torture and inhumanity of slavery is a bloody nightmare throughout the majority of history black people have on North America. BUT…Trevor Von Eeden MADE this same point, with many of the same graphic elements on pages 3-6 of this story. This is redundant. Worse, this breaks rule #1 of comics. Show, Don't Tell! That word balloon on page 30 is in danger of swallowing Super-Hobo's head. The ramblings undercut the gut-churning power of that single image, the photo of the scarred slave. Let that one picture do the talking. You take a powerful moment, drag it out, and make it … dull. That's the last thing you want to do, blunt the cutting edge of this story.Here's my suggestion for an edit. It will get ignored, but I'm an incorrigible kibitzer.Super-Hobo: That's a picture of my Grandfather, Jack. He was a slave, long before the Big War. White People did that! White People treat us like dogs.Young Jack: You must really hate White People, huh?See? I just cut out two and a half pages of ranting! And the story still makes sense and moves along just fine.I'm not the best person to say this. I have trouble shutting up. But … this issue has too many words. A little less talk and a little more action.
We went back and forth on that a lot with Trevor, but eventually decided not to cut the text. Hopefully, the entire thing reads better in the larger context of the novel.
Thank you, Glenn. At least you can see my point and I'm not just shouting into the wind. I'm not trying to be overly critical or nitpick. The art it too good and the story is too compelling to let this get lost in soap-box speechifying.
Preview your comment here.
I gotta agree with Russ. It just is too much dialogue and it does seem entirely unnatural and unnecessary. The other installments and the art and overall idea though are top notch. Ill wait to pass judgment till I see the whole work.
I do find it laughable that Russ of all people is calling for someone to be less verbose…
Hey, I found it laughable too! That's why I said stuff like, "His sermon/diatribe/lecture drones on and on and on. Like this! ;)," and "I'm not the best person to say this." I know irony when I see it, even if the jokes on me. But, then again, I don't think of myself as a GRAPHIC artist, just a neurotic commentator. But, laughable or not, do I have a point about this episode of "The Original Johnson"? Is it too wordy, too pedantic? When you get done laughing, I'd actually like your opinion on the story too.
I forget not everyone knows I made the "its too wordy" comment way back when I saw the pencils…