Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
Is that Peter Parker or Bobby Ewing?
Well, at least it was a straightforward reboot and not a ridiculous deal with the devil.
It was straightforward because they couldn't drag it out over multiple issues with variant covers. They had what, a quarter of a page?
Or were these the dailies you guys colored?Haven't seen the Spidey strip in years.
If I'd colored it, I'd like to think it would be more dynamic.
For sure, Glenn.Closer examination told me they were dailies.So Marvel made the switcheroo over three days.They wanted to get it over with fast.
Dumbest move Marvel has made in decades. Toss years of known, good continuity because marketing decided that the target audience was either teenage boys or prepubes. Forgetting about those of us who started reading it again because of intelligent, adult writing…Saves me money, though. I won't buy another Marvel title again, unless the writer is named Straczynski, David or someone of their caliber.Miles
"unless the writer is named Straczynski"Who do you think wrote One More Day?
He did, but under duress and wanting to remove his name from the story. I'm willing to give JMS a pass on that one 'cause we all know that turd of a story had Joe Q's idiocy stamped all over it.
Yeah, I'm surprised Joe didn't hang the name Cordwainer Bird on it. Harlan would've gone for that. Miles
"Dumbest move Marvel has made in decades. Toss years of known, good continuity…"One word: Clone.About the only good thing that came out of that debacle wasn't even part of the Marvel Universe proper – large parts of Spider-Girl.
I didn't even realize the Spider-Man strip was still running. So, when does Marvel start collecting it the way Fantagraphics or IDW is doing with Peanuts & Dick Tracy, respectively?Mr.Hauman, please write the blog explaining how you'd save One More Day. I'd love to read that.
Yesterday's (Sunday) installment of the Spider-Man newspaper comic told us in a narrative caption that the storyline takes place "long before Peter and M. J. were married." (or was it "years before?"). So, instead of some convoluted (and out of character) deal with Mephisto, where the marriage now never happened, the newspaper strip is giving us an extended flashback. The marriage still happens, it just hasn't happened yet.As to the relative quality of the Spider-Man strip, I have to say the stories (from the 70s or 80s, I think) collected in a trade size collection (I forget the exact title) seem a bit better written than some of the more recent offerings. The most recent storyline had a thug/gangster named "Big-Time." That, so far as I could tell, was his actual name, not a nickname. Everyone called him that, even his ex-wife. You think she, at least, would call him "Bill", or "George", anything but "Big-Time." Even "Sue" would make more sense.Sometimes I think the newspaper strip is being aimed at kids, and I'm getting the impression that those behind it feel that's the target audience for the Spider-Man strip. The storylines seem just a bit too simplistic.But anyway, the newspaper adventures of web-head are simply set in the past, with the marriage to M. J. not yet having occurred.Rick
Whatever…Sheesh!
The Spider-Man comic strip had grown rather disconnected from the comics continuity in the past couple of years. Peter and MJ had relocated to Hollywood so she could pursue her acting career, and JJ had gone west to become a television talking head, a la Bill O'Reilly. Given that it was that far off from the comic books — Spidey, a Los Angeles hero? — I assumed that it was going to stay in its own universe. Alas.