Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
Looks as if they still used the Scotchbrite trick the first film used – and why not? It worked a treat then and it's cheaper than doing CGI mapping on all the costumes.
There are few examples of sequels made decades after the orginal was made that work other than "Psycho" movies, and most of the time they come from someone needing money (like Perkins did and that was the only role that anyone would accept him for), or the director has something to say. I'm not saying this is a bad movie (it might be) but I might be more open to it if the director Steven Listberger and Disney should had made it in say 1985 when the idea was more fresh. My fear is that fans of the orginal will be let down by it because of Boxlighter and Bridges being 28 years older won't have much to do in it and they won't have much to do in it.
I don't know how you could have done the film only three years later and still had the son taking over.In a way, the severe length of time works in its favor– that it has been almost 30 years and that we can see the sheer distances involved, in so many ways, adds a sense of gravity that we don't normally get. It can happen– the Star Trek movies with the original cast showed the age and you could see how people were changing and how time was affecting the characters and the world.It's like Law & Order; it's been on so long that there's now history and back story, and you can call back to episodes that are 15 years old and see changes– something that can easily be lost in a reboot.